![]() Sentencing eighteen- to twenty-year-olds to life without parole should be considered cruel and unusual because it is disproportionate to this class of offenders’ culpability. This comment contends that Reynolds Wintersmith belonged to a class of offenders who should be categorically exempt from sentences of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. t gives me pause to think that that was the intent of Congress, to put somebody away for the rest of their life. ![]() his is your first conviction, and here you face life imprisonment. Usually a life sentence is imposed in state courts when somebody has been killed or severely hurt, or you got a recidivist. Under the federal law I have no discretion in my sentencing. ![]() When United States District Judge Philip Reinhard was sentencing Reynolds, he struggled with the mandatory minimum requirements: In 1994, he was sentenced to life without the possibility of parole for a nonviolent drug crime. Reynolds Wintersmith was just twenty years old when he learned he may spend the rest of his life in prison. Emily Powell, Underdeveloped and Over-Sentenced: Why Eighteen- to Twenty-Year-Olds Should Be Exempt from Life Without Parole, 52 U.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |